Darren Campbell has kicked off 2025 with promises of “a new era” for his community. But instead of tackling the growing scandals dragging down FBABB’s reputation—like the Belfast Telegraph’s reports on fake Amazon reviews and our massive USPTO trademark fraud investigation—Darren seems to be leaning harder into deflection and censorship.

In last night's Mighty Networks post, new rules were introduced: no “negativity,” removal for inactivity, and a directive to ignore “outside noise.” While Darren framed these as steps toward a fresh start, many clients see them as an effort to control the narrative rather than address the real issues. For those involved, it’s hard not to wonder—does FBABB genuinely care about its community, or is it all just smoke and mirrors?

You can view Darren's full post below. For now, we'll set aside Darren's outlandish claims about Fast Ambition—expect a follow-up article on that supposed success soon.

Silence on the Scandals

No Response to the Belfast Telegraph: In the past month, the Belfast Telegraph published an explosive article shedding light on FBABB’s questionable practices. From using brokers to promote fake Amazon reviews and our own USPTO investigation into 132 trademark applications filed with fake attorney credentials, the allegations are serious. Yet, Darren and his team haven’t said a word—no acknowledgment, no explanation, no solutions. The silence is deafening.

Dismissing Legitimate Concerns: Darren’s January post didn’t address the allegations. Instead, he brushed off valid, fact-based criticism as “outside noise” and encouraged clients to do the same. For many, this isn’t just frustrating—it’s alarming. Clients dealing with very real financial and legal risks are being told their concerns don’t matter. It sends a clear message: FBABB is more concerned about protecting its reputation than its clients.

The Trademark Scandal Swept Under the Rug: The trademark fraud scandal, involving unqualified individuals (Maria and Jason) filing trademarks on behalf of FBABB clients, has put countless businesses in a vulnerable position. Legal headaches, financial risks, and broken trust are just the beginning. Despite Darren’s earlier promises to “fix” the situation, his January post was silent on the matter. Instead of addressing the fallout, he pivoted to new community rules and talk of growth—a clear attempt to sidestep accountability.

Community Rules: Censorship Disguised as Accountability

The New Rules

Darren’s latest updates to FBABB’s community guidelines include some eyebrow-raising policies:

• No Negativity: A strict ban on any form of complaints, doubts, or criticism within the Mighty Networks platform.
• Mandatory Engagement: Members are required to actively participate in calls and discussions—or risk being kicked out without a refund.
• Disrespect Equals Expulsion: Leaks, dissent, or anything deemed “disrespectful” toward the program will lead to immediate removal.

Have you ever come across a company that behaves like this? We haven't.

Breaking Down the Rules

Censorship Over Transparency

These rules do more than create structure—they muzzle clients who have legitimate questions or concerns. Instead of providing solutions or support, the program pushes members into a corner: comply quietly or lose access to the resources you paid for.

Intimidation Tactics

The threat of being expelled without a refund is a clear attempt to discourage honest feedback. It sends a message that transparency isn’t welcome, leaving clients in a toxic environment where fear overshadows growth.

Dodging Accountability

By banning “negativity,” Darren sidesteps the real issues plaguing FBABB. From the trademark scandal and surprise fees to the fake reviews controversy, these policies seem designed to shift focus away from the problems that have shattered client trust. Instead of fixing the program’s flaws, Darren appears more focused on silencing the backlash.

“No Negativity” or Orwellian Censorship?

Darren’s 1984 Moment

The FBABB community’s new “no negativity” rule feels less like motivation and more like something straight out of 1984. Darren’s attempt to create a so-called “safe space” has been compared by some clients to authoritarian tactics—silencing dissent and spinning a narrative that suits the leadership while ignoring reality.

The irony hasn’t been lost on clients. A program that markets itself as transparent and supportive is now censoring any mention of its shortcomings. Questions about hidden fees, unresolved trademark issues, or poor results are labeled “disrespectful” and promptly deleted.

Fear of Retaliation

The chilling effect of these policies is real. One client shared:

"I raised a genuine concern about the trademark issues in a private message, only to be warned that I was being ‘negative’ and could lose access to the community. Now, everyone is too scared to speak up."

This fear has pushed discussions underground. Clients are flocking to platforms like our Guestbook and private Community group to share their experiences and seek advice without the looming threat of retaliation.

Darren’s heavy-handed approach may be silencing critics in his community, but it’s also driving them to speak out elsewhere—where he can’t control the narrative.

Trust Eroding: No Refunds for Removed Members

A New Level of Risk

Darren’s latest policy might be one of the most unsettling yet. Members who are deemed “inactive” or “negative” risk being removed from the program—without any refund. For clients who’ve poured £6,500 or more into FBABB, this policy feels like a slap in the face. It’s not just unfair; it’s downright exploitative.

The Legal Gray Area

While FBABB’s contracts may have clauses about participation, booting members without refunds over vague terms like “negativity” toes a legally questionable line. Some clients are already reaching out to consumer rights organisations, determined to challenge what they see as unjust and potentially unlawful practices.

The Financial and Emotional Toll

Being removed from the community doesn’t just cut off access to resources; it leaves many clients feeling abandoned and betrayed. One client summed up the emotional toll:

"I’m already in debt because of this program. Now, I’m being threatened with removal for not attending a weekly call. It’s humiliating and feels like a scam."

For clients who’ve invested their savings—and sometimes gone into debt—this kind of treatment is devastating. Instead of receiving the support they were promised, they’re met with threats and silence, further eroding trust in Darren and the program.

Silencing Clients Amid Growing Backlash

Deleted Posts and Banned Members

FBABB’s Mighty Networks platform is earning a reputation for censorship. Posts questioning the program’s practices—such as one client’s request for transparency about hidden fees—are being deleted almost instantly. In that particular case, the user was reportedly banned from the community shortly after their post disappeared. These actions are raising serious doubts about FBABB’s claims of fostering a supportive “family” environment.

External Platforms Become a Refuge

With internal dissent being stamped out, many clients are turning to external platforms to share their experiences. Our Guestbook, for instance, has become a hub for clients seeking to air grievances anonymously. It’s clear that as Darren clamps down on transparency, more clients are finding alternative ways to hold FBABB accountable.

Trustpilot and the Legal Intimidation Tactics

FBABB’s attempts to suppress criticism aren’t confined to its own platform. Several clients who’ve posted honest reviews on Trustpilot have received cease-and-desist letters, sparking outrage. However, Trustpilot has taken a firm stance, reiterating that reviews based on personal experiences are protected. These intimidation tactics could end up backfiring, as they only draw more attention to the issues within FBABB.

By trying to silence critics, Darren risks amplifying their voices elsewhere—a gamble that’s already showing signs of backfiring.

Accountability Deferred: Darren’s Hollow Promises

Empty Assurances

Darren’s bold promise to “fix whatever needs fixing” feels like an empty platitude to clients still struggling with the fallout from the trademark scandal. With 132 trademark applications flagged and a staggering $366,000 potentially needed to resolve the issues, his team’s silence is hard to ignore.

For many, the lack of support is deeply unsettling. Clients are left to shoulder the legal and financial risks alone, feeling abandoned by the very program they trusted. Darren’s frequent claims of being “1000% real” and committed to client success seem increasingly hollow in the face of his inaction.

Dismissing Outside Noise

By labeling valid concerns as “outside noise,” Darren isn’t just ignoring criticism—he’s alienating his clients. This dismissive attitude has created an environment where fact-based concerns are brushed aside, dissent is punished, and blind loyalty is rewarded.

Such a strategy doesn’t just erode trust—it sends a clear signal: Darren is more interested in controlling the narrative than addressing the real issues. The unwillingness to take responsibility speaks volumes about the priorities of FBABB.

A Community in Crisis

A Culture of Suppression

FBABB’s “no negativity” rule might be dressed up as an effort to create a positive space, but in practice, it’s a blunt tool for silencing dissent. Darren’s framing of the rule as a way to foster a supportive environment doesn’t hold up when clients are being stifled from voicing legitimate concerns. For those who’ve poured their life savings into the program, this systematic suppression feels like betrayal rather than support.

Clients Turning Elsewhere

Disillusioned clients aren’t staying quiet—they’re just finding new spaces to share their stories. The mass migration from FBABB’s official community to external platforms ours is a clear sign of a failing support system. By seeking out these independent platforms, clients are reclaiming their voices, leaving Darren struggling to maintain control of the narrative.

Trustpilot’s Rebuttal

FBABB’s intimidation tactics have extended to platforms like Trustpilot, where the program has tried to silence critics through legal threats. But Trustpilot’s firm stance against such behavior has only emboldened clients. By protecting genuine feedback, the platform stands in stark contrast to FBABB’s heavy-handed attempts at censorship.

As more clients share their experiences openly, the cracks in FBABB’s carefully curated image are becoming harder to ignore.

Questions Prospective Clients Must Ask

Before making a commitment, take a moment to consider these critical questions:

• Does this program value transparency and accountability?
• Are you willing to risk thousands of pounds in a program that silences concerns and ignores factual evidence?
• Can you feel secure in a community where valid questions are dismissed as negativity?

These are more than just hypothetical concerns—they’re the reality many FBABB clients are facing. Take the time to reflect and ensure your investment aligns with a program that truly supports its members.

The Fallout of 2025’s “New Era”

Darren’s much-touted “new era” for 2025 feels less like a fresh start and more like a strategic rebranding effort. Stricter community rules and continued inaction on major issues reveal the same old priorities: maintaining appearances over genuinely addressing client concerns. For those hoping for real change, it’s been a disappointing reality check.

The Power of Client Voices

While Darren tries to clamp down on dissent within FBABB, external platforms are giving silenced clients the space to share their stories. Platforms like Trustpilot and our website are amplifying the voices he’s working so hard to suppress. The mounting evidence—deleted posts, legal threats, and unresolved scandals—paints a damning picture of a program in decline.