If you’ve been following the drama around Darren Campbell, you’ll know we recently covered his TikTok meltdown in Darren Campbell’s TikTok Tirade: A Masterclass in Embarrassment. In that video, Darren went on a rant filled with baseless accusations, naming individuals he believes are associated with our website. While we’ve already highlighted how ridiculous his claims are, today we’re shifting the focus to something more serious: defamation.
What is defamation? How does it apply to Darren’s remarks? And why does his failure to provide evidence make his accusations fall flat? Let’s dive in.
What Is Defamation?
In simple terms, defamation is making false statements about someone that harm their reputation. For something to legally qualify as defamation, it must meet these criteria:
- The statement must be false.
- It must harm someone’s reputation in the eyes of a reasonable person.
- It must be communicated to others.
When Darren decided to post a TikTok naming individuals and making damaging claims without evidence, he waded straight into defamation territory. And here’s the thing: truth is the ultimate defense against defamation. While Darren’s accusations are based on wild guesses, every article we’ve published is grounded in verifiable facts—testimonials, screenshots, and videos from his own team.
What Darren Said: The Highlights
In his TikTok rant, Darren threw out several inflammatory claims, including:
- "Kirsty is a multi-millionaire pretending to be homeless."
Darren’s attempt to discredit Kirsty is as bizarre as it is unfounded. He offers zero evidence, making this not just defamatory but laughably desperate. - "She sold her house to hide assets from a serious crime unit."
Without any proof to back this wild claim, it reeks of deflection. Rather than addressing valid critiques of his program, Darren resorts to baseless conspiracy theories. - "There’s a WhatsApp group plotting to bring down The FBA Brand Builder."
Paranoia much? Even if such a group existed, it wouldn’t negate the verifiable issues raised by Darren’s own clients. Spoiler alert: we’re not part of any WhatsApp group. - "She’s making a mockery of ADHD."
Not only is this baseless, but it’s also offensive and ableist. It’s another example of Darren weaponizing personal circumstances to deflect from his own failings. - "She recorded every call to set me up."
If someone records calls with you, Darren, it’s likely because they don’t trust you—a sentiment echoed by countless former clients. - "Meet this f*ing dickhead."
Darren doesn’t stop at Kirsty. He goes on to launch personal attacks against other individuals, resorting to juvenile insults instead of addressing critiques like a professional. - "They’ve teamed up with three people who own their own Amazon coaching businesses."
Here, Darren claims a cabal of rival coaches is conspiring against him. Once again, he offers no evidence, just more paranoia and deflection.
Our Reporting Stands Tall
Let’s compare Darren’s approach to ours:
- Our Reporting: Every article we’ve published is backed by hard evidence, whether it’s video transcripts, screenshots, or direct testimonials from clients.
- Darren’s Accusations: Wild claims, zero proof. It’s all smoke and mirrors.
If Darren really believed we were lying, he’d have presented counter-evidence by now. Instead, he’s chosen to sling mud and hope some of it sticks. Spoiler alert: it hasn’t.
Why Darren’s Rant Is Defamation, Not Defense
Darren might think he’s defending his business, but calling people names and making baseless accusations doesn’t count as a defense. Here’s why:
- He provides no proof. Darren’s claims lack any factual backing, making them easy to dismiss.
- He’s harming reputations. By naming individuals and making false statements about them, Darren is actively damaging their reputations.
- He’s doubling down on denial. Instead of addressing the issues raised in our articles, Darren is trying to distract people with personal attacks.
The Evidence Gap: Why Darren’s Claims Don’t Hold Water
The biggest difference between us and Darren? We come with receipts. Every article we’ve published about The FBA Brand Builder is backed by:
- Video clips from his own program.
- Transcripts of calls and meetings.
- Testimonials from current and former clients.
- Screenshots of advice shared by his team.
Meanwhile, Darren’s accusations rely on nothing more than his own imagination. If he had proof to back up his claims, he’d have shared it by now.
Defamation vs. Accountability
Let’s be clear: holding someone accountable isn’t defamation. When we report on Darren’s misleading program, we’re not making baseless accusations—we’re exposing the truth. If Darren believes otherwise, he’s free to challenge us with evidence. Until then, his claims remain just that: claims.
Darren, Focus on the Facts
Darren, here’s some free advice: if you want to address the issues raised about your program, start with accountability. Screaming into TikTok about imaginary conspiracies only makes you look desperate.
We’ve yet to see any meaningful counterarguments from your team about the concerns we’ve raised. Why? Because our reporting is based on evidence—something you seem to lack.
Until then, we’ll keep doing what we do best: reporting the truth. If you’d like to send us a rebuttal backed by actual proof, our inbox is open. But if all you’ve got is more baseless claims, maybe it’s time to log off and take a long, hard look at your business practices.